Close Menu
    Track all markets on TradingView
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Term And Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    WSJ-Crypto
    • Home
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Blockchain
    • Crypto Mining
    • Economy and markets
    WSJ-Crypto
    Home » Cryptocurrency Governance in the Spotlight at Roman Storm Trial
    Economy and markets

    Cryptocurrency Governance in the Spotlight at Roman Storm Trial

    wsjcryptoBy wsjcrypto24 Luglio 2025Nessun commento2 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    “`html

    US legal officials in the criminal proceeding against Tornado Cash co-founder and developer Roman Storm presented evidence from an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent as they prepare to conclude their case on Thursday.

    As reported by Inner City Press on Wednesday, IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent Stephan George provided testimony indicating that he had analyzed transaction records linked to cryptocurrency platforms Crypto.com and Binance.

    George allegedly claimed that Storm “[had] control” over assets after an account affiliated with Binance transferred crypto to Tornado Cash smart contract addresses, based on exchanges between the co-founders: Storm, Alexey Pertsey, and Roman Semenov.

    The testimony came after a challenge from Storm’s legal representatives, who sought to dismiss it based on an evaluation of Hanfeng Lin’s background — a victim of a romance scam who previously testified in the trial regarding misappropriated crypto funds sent via Tornado Cash. Storm’s legal team indicated they might request a mistrial after findings implied that none of the assets reached the crypto mixing service.

    “While his accounting background may have provided him with the qualifications to perform the analysis he was retained for, it does not qualify him to testify concerning the tracing of cryptocurrency illicit proceeds which the government is now positing, encompassing not just tracing, but also assigning control over various wallet addresses to the purported hacker, where the identification of accounts is in question,” stated Storm’s legal team in a filing on Tuesday.

    The question of whether Storm possessed the capacity to control Tornado Cash by obstructing or discouraging illicit funds from being laundered, as the prosecution asserts, is pivotal to the arguments in his criminal proceedings.

    Another government witness was anticipated to testify regarding whether Storm could have altered the platform to discourage criminal conduct, but was reportedly primarily focused on discussing the mixer’s reaction to sanctions.

    Related: Essential information about Roman Storm’s Tornado Cash trial