Several weeks ago, we briefly discussed how civil asset forfeiture might pertain to Bitcoin, a procedure whereby the Government can confiscate assets from citizens without formally accusing them of any wrongdoing. With the US Government indicating that civil asset forfeiture will play a fundamental role in establishing its Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act of 2023, commonly referred to as the FAIR Act, is arguably the most crucial legislation currently proposed in Congress to shield Bitcoin holders from significant Government overreach. Without this, many individuals may find their bitcoins confiscated in favor of the Reserve with little recourse available.
Civil asset forfeiture has long been asserted as requiring substantial reform. Nationwide, various states have become notorious for abusing this mechanism to financially benefit their law enforcement agencies, which may retain the seized funds. Instances include police taking a Vietnam veteran’s vehicle for being a “container” of marijuana or trying to claim a man’s life savings due to a seatbelt infraction; civil asset forfeiture is “one of the most severe abuses of power in the country today,” according to the Institute for Justice.
This process is particularly problematic as it introduces a financial motivation for law enforcement to seize citizen’s belongings without adhering to due process, as indicated by the ACLU. Given bitcoin’s limited supply and the resulting increase in its value over time, this financial motive intensifies when civil asset forfeiture is utilized to construct the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
To safeguard citizens against the misuse of civil asset forfeiture, the FAIR Act of 2023, which was reintroduced in 2024 and co-sponsored by Sen. Lummis and others, seeks to amend the federal regulations governing the process to ensure that civil asset forfeiture actions comply with due process as dictated by the Fifth Amendment.
First, it achieves this by elevating the evidentiary standard from “preponderance” of evidence – signifying that a party’s assertion is more likely true than not – to clear and convincing evidence, thereby heightening the proof burden that the Government must meet to enforce a forfeiture.
With the FAIR Act, enforcement agencies must demonstrate that a significant link existed between the property and the crime, along with the fact that the property’s owner intended to facilitate the offense through the property, or knowingly allowed or was willfully ignorant of another’s use of the property in relation to the offense. This aspect of the Act is crucial in its application to bitcoin.
Currently, the Government could appropriate an individual’s legally acquired bitcoin if the UTXO had, for instance, been previously involved in sanction evasion or associated with a darknet market; regardless of whether the owner was aware of the coin’s background upon obtaining it. By instituting active consent and willful ignorance, the FAIR Act stipulates that the bitcoin owner to be forfeited must be cognizant of the BTC’s provenance for forfeiture to be valid.
The FAIR Act also mandates that the Government provide legal counsel to property owners who cannot afford representation, or when the costs of representation would surpass the value of the confiscated property – a dilemma that has arguably deterred many from challenging the seizure of assets initially, as civil asset forfeiture essentially inverts the burden of proof. At present, to reclaim your property, you must disprove the Government rather than them having to build a case against you.
“Civil asset forfeiture permits federal law enforcement to take property from Americans who haven’t even been charged with or convicted of a crime,” stated Sen. Booker, who introduced the Bill alongside Sen. Rand Paul. “Under this framework, police can retain cash, vehicles, and even homes based on mere suspicion of wrongdoing. These losses frequently translate into profits for law enforcement since the onus lies with the property owner to justify getting their belongings back.”
“The government should never possess the authority to confiscate an individual’s property without due process. Yet, under existing civil asset forfeiture regulations, Americans are deprived of their property without ever being charged or found guilty of a crime. The FAIR Act directly confronts these injustices and is an essential step toward reinstating equity and accountability, safeguarding property owners’ rights, and preventing the exploitation of civil forfeiture laws once and for all,” Paul added in the statement.
If you support the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, the enactment of the FAIR Act should be a prerequisite for its formation to guarantee that the Government’s bitcoin stack is not constructed upon the misuse of its authorities.
This is a guest post by L0la L33tz. The views expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
