{"id":9093,"date":"2025-02-28T01:13:38","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T00:13:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wsj-crypto.com\/?p=9093"},"modified":"2025-02-28T01:13:38","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T00:13:38","slug":"stablecoins-take-center-stage-at-inaugural-u-s-digital-assets-subcommittee-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wsj-crypto.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/28\/stablecoins-take-center-stage-at-inaugural-u-s-digital-assets-subcommittee-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Stablecoins Take Center Stage at Inaugural U.S. Digital Assets Subcommittee Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Today, the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets conducted its inaugural hearing, titled \u201cExploring Bipartisan Legislative Frameworks for Digital Assets,\u201d during which various subcommittee members and witnesses from the cryptocurrency sector primarily deliberated on the regulations concerning stablecoins.<\/p>\n

Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), a longstanding advocate for Bitcoin and the digital asset sector, led the hearing with support from the subcommittee’s ranking member, Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).<\/p>\n

The participants included Tim Massad, previous Chair of the CFTC and Research Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Jai Massari, Chief Legal Officer at Lightspark; Jonathan Jachym, Global Head of Policy and Government Relations at Kraken; and Lewis Cohen, Partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP.<\/p>\n

Setting a proactive tone for the session, Senator Lummis expressed her determination to contribute towards passing bipartisan legislation for Bitcoin and stablecoins. (This was among the few instances in the meeting where “Bitcoin” was referenced. The other notable moment was when Massad articulated his objections to establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

Throughout the discussion, Massad emphasized the significance of overseeing stablecoin transactions. He proposed extending the \u201cregulatory perimeter\u201d to tackle AML (Anti-Money Laundering)<\/a> issues linked with stablecoins and even suggested that smart contracts be structured to reduce the likelihood of misuse by malicious entities.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\u201cOur entire [Bank Secrecy Act] framework relies on centralized intermediaries.\u201d @timmassad<\/a> calls on Congress to extend the \u201cregulatory perimeter\u201d and require \u201cstablecoin issuers to aggressively monitor transactions and freeze stablecoins.\u201d pic.twitter.com\/Y5TyGRx4i1<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Nick Anthony (@EconWithNick) February 26, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\u201c[We might] program smart contracts so that transactions can\u2019t proceed without proper vetting,\u201d Massad commented.<\/p>\n

He also recommended that stablecoin issuers \u201cvigorously monitor stablecoin activities\u201d as a method to detect any AML infractions.<\/p>\n

Massari highlighted that authorities can also monitor stablecoin transactions since these assets operate on public blockchains. She requested reasonable regulation concerning the technology, as long as it does not become too encumbering.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe tend to [when regulating] financial services take new innovations and force them into the existing frameworks,\u201d she noted.<\/p>\n

Moreover, she advocated for a \u201cunified set of standards\u201d to regulate stablecoin issuers, enabling users to feel more confident that all stablecoins are appropriately backed.<\/p>\n

Jachym attempted to redirect the hearing\u2019s attention from stablecoins to the Digital Asset Market Structure bill<\/a>, asserting that it is \u201cessential\u201d for regulatory bodies to define clear rules regarding which digital assets qualify as securities.<\/p>\n

However, his remarks did not gain much traction. Massad contended that discussions on stablecoins held greater importance than the market structure bill, arguing that the bill isn\u2019t an urgent issue, as regulators can apply existing securities laws to govern crypto markets.<\/p>\n

Jachym underscored that \u201cthe jurisdictional boundaries [concerning] digital assets should be straightforward\u201d and claimed that \u201cthe absence of regulatory clarity in the U.S. has hindered growth [within the cryptocurrency sector.]\u201d<\/p>\n

Cohen offered a similar viewpoint, indicating that crypto entrepreneurs in the U.S. \u201cconstantly face the threat of litigation,\u201d alluding to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler\u2019s \u201cregulation-by-enforcement<\/a>\u201d methodology.<\/p>\n

He also communicated that the \u201cambiguous regulatory context has placed both consumers and users of digital assets in jeopardy.\u201d<\/p>\n

The sole participant during the hearing who openly contested the U.S. government\u2019s ambition to (over)regulate digital assets was Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH).<\/p>\n

\u201cThe government exhibits this absolute desire to control matters,\u201d remarked Senator Moreno, adding that several recent technologies have been applied for unlawful purposes\u2014not solely crypto.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy all of a sudden, when it comes to digital currencies, have we in Washington, D.C. decided we will dictate the pace of innovation?\u201d he concluded.<\/p>\n

Throughout the session, subcommittee members inquired of the witnesses regarding which global jurisdictions the U.S. should emulate in crafting its digital asset regulatory framework.<\/p>\n

Massad advocated for Europe and the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)<\/a> framework, which the European Union has recently enacted, whereas Jachym suggested examining states like Wyoming, where Kraken is headquartered, to learn from the crypto legislation the state\u2019s legislature has approved<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Although the Senators on the subcommittee and the witnesses present offered diverse viewpoints on the discussed issues, a prevailing sentiment resonated through the hearing: it’s urgent for politicians from both parties to unite and establish lucid guidelines for the cryptocurrency sector.<\/p>\n

\u201cBipartisan backing for crypto policy is no longer a distant aspiration,\u201d Jachym remarked, conveying a measure of relief.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n