At DC Fintech 2025, Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse depicted the firm\u2019s attitude post-litigation as boldly growth-oriented, asserting that US policy currents have transitioned from \u201cformidable headwinds to quite significant tailwinds\u201d and that the sector is nearer to lasting clarity than at any time since the SEC\u2019s enforcement-driven methodology became prevalent.<\/p>\n
Ripple Seeks US Crypto Dominance<\/h2>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re going to maintain an offensive strategy,\u201d he stated<\/a>, outlining Ripple\u2019s immediate focuses on payments, custody, and stablecoins while emphasizing an ambitious posture that now encompasses a $1.25 billion acquisition of the leading broker Hidden Road<\/a> and a $200 million takeover of enterprise stablecoin provider Rail. He mentioned that further announcements are approaching: \u201cWe believe now is the right moment to invest.\u201d<\/p>\n Garlinghouse placed that assurance in the political shift he perceives in Washington following Ripple\u2019s courtroom triumph. He characterized the firm as \u201cthe forefront of the Biden administration\u2019s initiative against crypto through the SEC,\u201d but contended the battle enhanced Ripple\u2019s reputation and sparked industry mobilization on Capitol Hill.<\/p>\n Highlighting the House’s passage of the Clarity Act with bipartisan backing, he remarked, \u201cThe Clarity Act<\/a> advanced in the House with approximately 78 Democrats supporting a Republican bill, which I believe reflects the eagerness for these technologies to be accepted.\u201d While he refrained from predicting Senate outcomes, he stressed that the momentum is bipartisan and technology-focused rather than ideological: \u201cThis discussion should never have been partisan. It\u2019s akin to claiming one side is pro-email and the other is anti-email.\u201d<\/p>\n The CEO’s most pointed remarks targeted the SEC\u2019s former stance under Chair Gary Gensler, which he described as detrimental to innovation and consumer safety alike. Quoting the judge in Ripple\u2019s matter, Garlinghouse stated, \u201cA federal judge remarked about the Gensler SEC,<\/a> \u2018they are not adhering to a faithful commitment to the law.\u2019 That\u2019s quite damaging for a federal judge who was appointed by Obama.\u201d<\/p>\n He added, \u201cI certainly do not believe we\u2019ll revert to that. Frankly, I believe that was a bleak period for technology in the United States,\u201d arguing that regulation through enforcement pushed operations overseas \u201cwhere ironically it\u2019s less regulated and there are diminished consumer protections.\u201d<\/p>\n Garlinghouse consistently differentiated Ripple, a private enterprise that \u201csecured venture funding and issued stock,\u201d from XRP, \u201can open-source technology that essentially underlies our offerings.\u201d<\/p>\n Addressing ongoing misunderstandings, he stated: \u201cIndividuals will assert things like, well, XRP has a CEO. And I\u2019m like, who is it? Ripple has a CEO \u2014 that\u2019s me. There are numerous, if not a hundred other CEOs working within the XRP ecosystem.\u201d<\/p>\n He emphasized that Ripple does not dictate the XRP Ledger\u2019s governing rules: \u201cThere have been modifications passed to the XRP open-source technology that we opposed \u2014 and they still succeeded. That\u2019s acceptable. That\u2019s open source technology,\u201d underscoring that ledger amendments necessitate 80% community consensus.<\/p>\n Regarding banking accessibility, Garlinghouse implored regulators and incumbents to align compliance expectations with equitable access to essential infrastructure. \u201cHold traditional finance accountable,\u201d he declared. \u201cYes, the crypto sector should meet the same standards as AML, KYC, OFAC. Yes, yes, yes. And we should have equivalent access to infrastructure like a Fed master account. You can\u2019t advocate one and then oppose the other. That\u2019s insincere.\u201d<\/p>\n He confirmed Ripple has sought a national bank charter and contended that granting master accounts<\/a> to firms such as Circle<\/a> and Ripple would \u201cde-risk stablecoins,\u201d provided they are \u201cheld to similar regulatory benchmarks as a bank.\u201d He also mentioned Ripple initiated its stablecoin \u201cunder a New York trust license,\u201d describing it as \u201cthe gold standard\u201d for the institutional clientele the company aims for.<\/p>\n The practical limitation for cautious banks, he suggested, is the lack of fully established legislation, even as agency stances evolve. He pointed to recent bank-side engagement \u201caround stablecoins for sure\u201d and mentioned \u201cthe Genius Act obviously assisted,\u201d while acknowledging some institutions still harbor concerns about policy reversals in future election cycles.<\/p>\n Nevertheless, he argued time is working in crypto\u2019s favor and that whenever codification occurs, it will accelerate participation. \u201cThe longer it takes, the better I believe it is for the sector, hands down,\u201d he asserted, adding that Ripple\u2019s court clarity promptly stimulated development \u201cin and around the XRP ecosystem.\u201d<\/p>\n Garlinghouse framed the wider policy discussion as a contest for fintech supremacy. \u201cThe US embraced the Internet in the late 90s. We\u2019ve leaned back in blockchain. It doesn\u2019t make sense to me,\u201d he noted, pointing out entrepreneurs already gravitate toward jurisdictions with clear regulations such as Europe\u2019s MiCA or the UK\u2019s framework.<\/p>\n He urged Congress to cease \u201cregulation through enforcement\u201d in favor of predictable frameworks so that \u201cconsumers are safeguarded\u201d and companies \u201cunderstand how to operate,\u201d emphasizing that \u201cthe vast, vast, vast majority of entrepreneurs I know in crypto wish to comply with the rules.\u201d<\/p>\n He also recounted the real outcomes of the previous policy climate, expressing that it was once \u201cvery, very challenging\u201d for major banks to engage and that he himself had been \u201cdebanked by Citibank in the past four years.\u201d The consequence, he argued, was a stalled US market while international clients proceeded forward, a dynamic he illustrated with a striking statistic: \u201cOne quick data point is 80 percent of Ripple\u2019s hiring between 2001 and 2004 [sic] was non-US, because that\u2019s where our customers were.\u201d<\/p>\n Today, he asserts the \u201cship has sailed\u201d regarding crypto\u2019s permanence in the US financial ecosystem. \u201cYou can\u2019t put the genie back in the bottle,\u201d he remarked. \u201cThis wave is still approaching. And I don\u2019t anticipate there\u2019s anything the US federal government will do to halt that.\u201d<\/p>\n At press time, XRP traded at $2.42.<\/p>\n Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com<\/p>\nRipple Possesses a CEO, XRP Does Not<\/h2>\n
Ripple\u2019s Advocacy for a Fed Master Account<\/h3>\n
![\"XRP](\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/XRPUSDT_2025-10-16_09-18-45.png?resize=1024%2C473\")
![](\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/safe.png\")
<\/p>\n